Scott Keith's "No Mercy 1999" review isn't just a wrestling match recap; it's a cultural touchstone for wrestling fans, a lightning rod for discussion, and a prime example of the power of subjective wrestling criticism. This article will delve into the infamous review, exploring why it resonates so strongly even today, examining the context surrounding it, and addressing some frequently asked questions.
What Was So Controversial About Scott Keith's No Mercy 1999 Review?
Scott Keith, a highly influential figure in online wrestling commentary, famously gave WWE's No Mercy 1999 pay-per-view a scathing review. His critique wasn't simply about match quality; it was a broader condemnation of the creative direction of the WWE at the time. He lambasted the booking choices, the perceived lack of compelling storylines, and the overall presentation of the event. This harsh assessment, delivered with Keith's signature blunt and uncompromising style, struck a chord with many fans who shared his frustrations. The controversy stemmed from the polarizing nature of his opinions, prompting fierce debates and solidifying his status as a powerful voice within the wrestling community. Some agreed wholeheartedly with his critical analysis, while others vehemently defended the show and its booking decisions.
Why is Scott Keith's No Mercy 1999 Review Still Remembered Today?
The lasting impact of Keith's review stems from several factors:
- The Power of Subjective Criticism: Keith's review wasn't presented as objective fact; it was a subjective interpretation of the event, reflecting his own preferences and analytical framework. This resonated with many fans who felt similarly disenchanted with the WWE product. It empowered them to voice their criticisms and engage in more nuanced discussions about wrestling quality.
- The Impact of Online Communities: The review was disseminated widely through online wrestling forums, which were rapidly gaining prominence at the time. This allowed for widespread discussion and fueled passionate debate, solidifying its place in wrestling history.
- The Legacy of the Review Itself: The review’s aggressive tone and blunt assessments, while controversial, created a memorable and impactful piece of wrestling criticism. It became less about the content of the pay-per-view itself and more about the discourse surrounding it.
Did Scott Keith Hate Everything About No Mercy 1999?
While highly critical, Keith didn't necessarily hate everything about No Mercy 1999. His review highlighted specific aspects he found problematic while acknowledging individual moments of excellence within the show. The overall negative tone overshadowed these positive elements, leading many to remember the review primarily as a blanket condemnation. However, a careful reading reveals a more nuanced take, analyzing both strengths and weaknesses.
What Other Reviews Did Scott Keith Write?
Scott Keith penned countless wrestling reviews throughout his career, many of which are still discussed and referenced by wrestling fans today. He reviewed numerous pay-per-views and events across various wrestling promotions. His work is remembered for its sharp wit, critical eye, and unwavering honesty. While his No Mercy 1999 review gained the most notoriety, his body of work provides a valuable historical record of the professional wrestling landscape of that era.
What Happened to Scott Keith?
Scott Keith's career as a wrestling reviewer evolved over time. He eventually stepped away from regularly writing reviews, though his previous work continues to be influential. His legacy remains firmly established in the wrestling internet community due to the sheer impact of his insightful and often controversial analyses.
In conclusion, Scott Keith's No Mercy 1999 review transcended the realm of simple match analysis. It became a cultural phenomenon within the professional wrestling online community, illustrating the power of subjective criticism and the lasting impact of online discourse. Its continued relevance underscores the ongoing debate surrounding wrestling quality, creative direction, and the evolving relationship between fans and their favorite performers.
